I’ve remembered.
There was a discussion on a board about journals wanting (paraphrased) “surprising turns of phrase or startling images.”
I’ve never really thought very hard about such a request. It’s a common one and, like many common things, it was just there.
But when I do think about it, I realize that I have a big problem with this request. For a turn of phrase to be surprising, or startling, it can’t feel as if it rose directly from what came before. It has to be, at least to some degree, anomalous and unsupported. This demand seems to require, in fact, that a poem be disjointed, not built up word by word to an inevitable, whole, conclusion, but scattered, jumpy, an unpredictable yappy dog.
There are times when I’ll read an image that feels so right, so perfect. But can an image be both a perfect fit and startling? I’m not sure that it can. There has to be a sense of wrongness in order to startle. Something where it shouldn’t be.
The comparison I used in that earlier thread was to a jump scene in a movie, something that is thrown in just to make you lurch or squeal. But the cat coming out of the dark room is hollow and fake. Are these “jump images” or “jump phrases” any better?