Is it the feather that fails, or the bird?

I’m coming out of a poetry-less funk, or trying to come out of it anyway.  I go through these phases pretty often and they can be of two types:  the I-don’t-care-about-poetry-at-all-right-now type or the I-care-but-can’t-write.-HELLLP! type.

I’ve always thought it was just a quirk of my brain, a feast or famine tendency or a desperate struggle to get away before being Michael Corleone’d right back in.

But is it?  We all know people who wrote poetry as teenagers, people who turned to poems and then turned away.  Did they change, or did they learn that poetry can’t give them what they need?  Did they fail as poets, or did poetry fail them?  Do I turn from poetry because I am fickle, or because I’m starving to death on a diet of imagery and Big Endings?

Biologically, pandas are carnivores.  Yet they survive on a diet of bamboo.  Bamboo.  One of the least nutritionally dense plants in the world keeps the pandas alive.  A few years back, I read a story that said farmers were noticing something was eating their sheep–hungry pandas whose bamboo was too scarce were reverting to their carnivorous ways.

Did they turn back later?  Go back to bamboo and maybe lie awake dreaming of mutton?  Hell if I know.  And hell if I know whether my own lack of sticktoitiveness reflects more on me or on poetry.  Some things by their nature are flashes in the pan.  Some things by their nature are bamboo.  Some people by their natures are fickle.  Some people by their natures are quitters.

Which fails first, the dodo or the feather?